Magna carta for women health workers, teachers, and minimum-wage earners in the workplace: Policy awareness and organizational compliance
Vol 9, Issue 1, 2024, Article identifier:
VIEWS - 239 (Abstract) 90 (PDF)
Abstract
This health crisis caused unimaginable impacts and changes to the labor force and organizations pushing many policies and laws in the edge such as the Philippines’ magna carta of women. Inequalities at work, dimming employee benefits, and relentless working hours for women in the workplace are happening in third-world countries. This research project examines the awareness and compliance of companies and organizations in the lens of the health workers, teachers, and minimum-wage earners relative to the magna carta of women in the workplace. This study extracts corroborative proof from 202 women respondents coming from public and private organizations or companies through the magna carta of women-based survey on awareness and organizational compliance according to the workforce. The findings reveal that there should be more emphasis on women in the lowest income bracket and women who did not finish college. Furthermore, there is an opportunity for concerned organizations to educate the employees that not implementing these rights are forms of neglect of duty on the part of the employer. The results of the study unearth important information on what are the prevalent compliance mishaps of the organizations and how it can place working women in peril.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Sumadsad C, Tuazon A. Gender and development (GAD) awareness in a higher education institution. International Journal of Educational Science and Research (IJESR) 2016; 6(3): 2016.
2. Hargreaves L, Flutter J. The status of teachers and the teaching profession: A desk-study for educational international. Department of Education, University of Cambridge, UK; 2013; Unpublished work.
3. Carpio LPD, Cayabyab HTF, Te DMIT. Determining the implementation status of benefits under magna carta of public health workers (RA 7305) in the Philippines. Acta Medica Philippina 2021; 55(1): 47–53.
4. Lavado RF. Magna Carta of Public Health Workers: Does It Really Fulfill Its Intent. Philippine Institute; 2011.
5. Prescott M. Providers for the Household and Nation: The Localized Production and Migration of Filipino Nurses [PhD thesis]. The University of Arizona; 2016.
6. Klug F. A Magna Carta for All Humanity: Homing in on Human Rights. Routledge; 2015.
7. Rice JK. Teacher Quality: Understanding the Effectiveness of Teacher Attributes. Economic Policy Institute; 2003.
8. Ziegler M. The conservative magna carta. The North Carolina Law Review 2015; 94: 1653.
9. Gil TO. Oh my gad! A case study on the implementation of gender and development among private higher education institutions. SDCA Asia-Pacific Multidisciplinary Research Journal 2020; 2: 48–53.
10. Moser C, Moser A. Gender mainstreaming since Beijing: A review of success and limitations in international institutions. Gender & Development 2005; 13(2): 11–22. doi: 10.1080/13552070512331332283
11. Schwartz CS, Sinicrope SR. Prospective elementary teachers’ perceptions of gender differences in children’s attitudes toward mathematics. School Science and Mathematics 2013; 113(8): 410–416. doi: 10.1111/ssm.12045
12. Perez JA. Health worker benefits in a period of broad civil service reform: The Philippine experience. Human Resources for Health Development Journal; 1998.
13. Federici S. Feminism and the Politics of the Commons. PM Press; 2018.
14. Babakr Z, Mohamedamin P, Kakamad K. Piaget’s cognitive developmental theory: Critical review. Education Quarterly Reviews 2019; 2(3).
15. Barrouillet P. Theories of cognitive development: From Piaget to today. Developmental Review 2015; 38: 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.004
16. Lefa B. The Piaget theory of cognitive development: An educational implications. Educational psychology 2014; 1(1): 1–8.
17. Alvarez GAA, Mosqueda EL, Tijing CLT, et al. Teachers level of awareness of RA 4670 in selected schools of Negros Oriental, Philippines. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology 2020; 8(12): 859–864. doi: 10.22214/ijraset.2020.32611
18. Antonoplis S. Studying socioeconomic status: Conceptual problems and an alternative path forward. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2023; 18(2): 275–292. doi: 10.1177/17456916221093615
19. Kraus MW, Piff PK, Keltner D. Social class as culture: The convergence of resources and rank in the social realm. Current directions in psychological science 2011; 20(4): 246–250. doi: 10.1177/0963721411414654
20. Stephens NM, Markus HR, Phillips LT. Social class culture cycles: How three gateway contexts shape selves and fuel inequality. Annual review of psychology 2014; 65: 611–634. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115143
21. Fuller JB, Raman M. Dismissed by Degrees: How Degree Inflation is Undermining US Competitiveness and Hurting America’s Middle Class. Accenture, Grads of Life, Harvard Business School; 2017.
22. Ingram P, Oh JJ. Mapping the class ceiling: The social class disadvantage for attaining management positions. Academy of Management Discoveries 2022; 8(1): 56–76. doi: 10.5465/amd.2020.0030
23. Jansen AJ, White LA, Dhuey E, et al. Training and skills development policy options for the changing world of work. Canadian Public Policy 2019; 45(4): 460–482. doi: 10.3138/cpp.2019-024
24. Tejero LMS, Leyva EWA, Abad PJB, et al. Production, recruitment, and retention of health workers in rural areas in the Philippines. Acta Medica Philippina 2022; 56(8). doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.1510
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i1.1735
(239 Abstract Views, 90 PDF Downloads)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jason V. Chavez, Atty. Marti W. Gregorio, Aracelie L. Araneta, Cristie D. Bihag
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/