Challenges in implementing online assessments at Maldivian higher education institutions: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic
Vol 9, Issue 3, 2024, Article identifier:
VIEWS - 68 (Abstract) 70 (PDF)
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic forced Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) to abruptly adopt online assessments in place of traditional assessments, posing several challenges especially in the developing countries. The purpose of this study was to explore the challenges experienced by lecturers in implementing online assessments at HEIs in the Maldives, during the time of COVID-19 pandemic. Data was collected using qualitative, semi-structured interviews from a purposefully selected sample of 30 lecturers representing eleven different disciplines and ten HEIs in the country. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis method. Findings revealed seven major themes which include difficulties in keeping up with the fast-changing assessment policies; students lack of awareness on institutional assessment policies and procedures; inadequate infrastructure and work-space to deliver online assessment; lack of technological competency of lecturers and students; issues related to work-load and time management; lecturers’ competency in designing online assessments; addressing student diversity; and ensuring academic integrity. In the light of these findings, it is recommended that both students and lecturers need to be made aware of institutional assessment policies, better training needs to be offered for lecturers to enhance their skills in designing and implementing online assessments so that they can offer more authentic online assessments that would enhance academic integrity.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Wibowo S, Grandhi S, Chugh R, et al. A pilot study of an electronic exam system at an Australian University. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 2016, 45(1): 5-33. doi: 10.1177/0047239516646746
2. Ghanbari N, Nowroozi S. The practice of online assessment in an EFL context amidst COVID-19 pandemic: views from teachers. Language Testing in Asia. 2021, 11(1). doi: 10.1186/s40468-021-00143-4
3. Waheeda A, Muna F, Shina A, et al. Benefits of online assessments in higher education institutions: lessons from COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2023, (03): 1-18. ISSN 2805-5187
4. Waheeda A, Muna F, Shina A, et al. Online assessments in Maldivian higher education institutions: Challenges faced by students, Issues in Educational Research. 2023, 33 (03): 1-18, 1233-1249
5. Ilgaz H, Afacan Adanır G. Providing online exams for online learners: Does it really matter for them? Education and Information Technologies. 2019, 25(2): 1255-1269. doi: 10.1007/s10639-019-10020-6
6. Shraim K. Online Examination Practices in Higher Education Institutions: Learners’ Perspectives. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 2019, 20(4): 185-196. doi: 10.17718/tojde.640588
7. Fatima SS, Idress R, Jabeed K, et al. Online assessment in undergraduate medical education: Challenges and solutions from a LMIC university. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021, 37(4). doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.4.3948
8. Perwitasari F, Astuti NB, Atmojo S. Online Learning and Assessment: Challenges and Opportunities During Pandemic COVID-19. Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Assessment and Policy (ICEAP 2020). 2021. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.210423.077
9. Sharadgah AT, Sa’di AR. Preparedness of Institutions of Higher Education for Assessment in Virtual Learning Environments During the COVID-19 Lockdown: Evidence of bona fide challenges and pragmatic solutions. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research. 2020, 19: 755-774. doi: 10.28945/4615
10. Al-Maqbali AH, Raja Hussain RM. The impact of online assessment challenges on assessment principles during COVID-19 in Oman. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. 2022, 19(2): 73-92. doi: 10.53761/1.19.2.6
11. Ali L, Dmour N. The shift to online assessment due to covid-19: An empirical study of university students, behaviour and performance, in the region of uae. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 2021, 11(5): 220-228. doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.5.1515
12. Maheshwari G. Factors affecting students’ intentions to undertake online learning: an empirical study in Vietnam. Education and Information Technologies. 2021, 26(6): 6629-6649. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10465-8
13. Mirza HS. University teachers’ perceptions of online assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic in Lebanon. American Academic & Scholarly Research Journal 2021. 11(10).
14. Alruwais N, Wills G, Wald M. Advantages and challenges of using e-assessment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 2018, 8(1): 34-37. doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.1.1008
15. Rahmani A. Shifting towards online assessment: A new promising Gate in the Higher Educational Level. Arab World English Journal. 2021, 7(1): 217-238. doi: 10.24093/awej/call7.16
16. Fitriyah I, Jannah M. Online assessment effect in EFL classroom: An investigation on students and teachers' perceptions. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. 2021, 5(2): 265-284.
17. Ilgaz H, Afacan Adanır G. Providing online exams for online learners: Does it really matter for them? Education and Information Technologies. 2019, 25(2): 1255-1269. doi: 10.1007/s10639-019-10020-6
18. Cutri RM, Mena J, Whiting EF. Faculty readiness for online crisis teaching: transitioning to online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Teacher Education. 2020, 43(4): 523-541. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2020.1815702
19. Alsadoon H. Challenges of deploying online exams. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala. 2021, 13(1Sup1). doi: 10.18662/rrem/13.1sup1/403
20. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches, 4th ed. Sage. 2012.
21. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006, 3(2): 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
22. Clark VLP, Creswell JW. Understanding Research: A Consumer’s Guide. Pearsson Education Inc. 2015.
23. Lincoln YS, Guba EG, Pilotta JJ. Naturalistic inquiry. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 1985, 9(4): 438-439. doi: 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i3.1907
(68 Abstract Views, 70 PDF Downloads)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Fathimath Muna, Aishath Waheeda, Fathimath Shaheeda, Aishath Shina
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/