Discourse analysis on same-sex relationship through the lens of religious and social belief systems
Vol 9, Issue 1, 2024, Article identifier:
VIEWS - 342 (Abstract) 146 (PDF)
Abstract
Religious beliefs and systems have a profound impact on shaping individuals' attitudes towards same-sex relationships. There is a diverse range of perspectives within religious communities, with some individuals adhering to traditional teachings that condemn homosexuality, while others engage in a process of reinterpretation to support and accept same-sex relationships. This qualitative study aims to analyze the different perspectives about same-sex relationship from the lenses of religious and social belief systems. Purposive sampling was used to select the participants (n=16) who identify themselves as a member of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer (LGBTQ) community (n=5) and religious people (n=11). Findings indicated the complexity of religious influence on social issues and emphasizes the role of individual engagement with faith in either hindering or facilitating acceptance to same-sex relationship. People who are inclined to their religious faith tend to condemn same-sex relationship. Notably, this study observed different interpretations of people about their religion and faith. While others believed it is against God’s will to engage in same-sex relationship, others interpret their belief in more holistic and inclusive way. Nevertheless, this study underscored the importance of understanding the evolving societal attitudes and the role of religion in fostering social discussion, tolerance, and inclusivity within diverse religious communities and society at large.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Adamczyk A, Pitt C. Shaping attitudes about homosexuality: The role of religion and cultural context. Social Science Research 2009; 38(2): 338–351. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.01.002
2. Jonathan E. The influence of religious fundamentalism, right-wing authoritarianism, and Christian orthodoxy on explicit and implicit measures of attitudes toward homosexuals. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 2008; 18(4): 316–329. doi: 10.1080/10508610802229262
3. Perry SL. Multiracial church attendance and support for same‐sex romantic and family relationships. Sociological Inquiry 2013; 83(2): 259–285. doi: 10.1111/soin.12005
4. Schulte LJ, Battle J. The relative importance of ethnicity and religion in predicting attitudes towards gays and lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality 2004; 47(2): 127–142. doi: 10.1300/J082v47n02_08
5. Baunach DM. Changing same-sex marriage attitudes in America from 1988 through 2010. Public Opinion Quarterly 2012; 76(2): 364–378. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfs022
6. Becker AB. What’s marriage (and family) got to do with it? Support for same‐sex marriage, legal unions, and gay and lesbian couples raising children. Social Science Quarterly 2012; 93(4): 1007–1029. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2012.00844.x
7. Whitehead AL, Perry SL. Religion and support for adoption by same-sex couples: The relative effects of religious tradition, practices, and beliefs. Journal of Family Issues 2014; 37(6): 789–813. doi: 10.1177/0192513x14536564
8. Perry SL, Whitehead AL. Religion and public opinion toward same‐sex relations, marriage, and adoption: Does the type of practice matter? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 2016; 55(3): 637–651. doi: 10.1111/jssr.12215
9. Burdette AM, Ellison CG, Hill TD. Conservative protestantism and tolerance toward homosexuals: An examination of potential mechanisms. Sociological Inquiry 2005; 75(2): 177–196. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682x.2005.00118.x
10. Haider-Markel DP, Joslyn MR. Beliefs about the origins of homosexuality and support for gay rights: An empirical test of attribution theory. Public Opinion Quarterly 2008; 72(2): 291–310. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfn015
11. Merino SM. Contact with gays and lesbians and same-sex marriage support: The moderating role of social context. Social Science Research 2013; 42(4): 1156–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.02.004
12. Perry SL, Whitehead AL. Same-sex adoption as a welfare alternative? Conservatism, neoliberal values, and support for adoption by same-sex couples. Journal of Homosexuality 2015; 62(12): 1722–1745. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1078209
13. Sherkat DE, de Vries KM, Creek S. Race, religion, and opposition to same‐sex marriage. Social Science Quarterly 2010; 91(1): 80–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00682.x
14. Whitehead AL, Baker JO. Homosexuality, religion, and science: Moral authority and the persistence of negative attitudes. Sociological Inquiry 2012; 82(4): 487–509. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682x.2012.00425.x
15. Cox, D., Navarro-Rivera, J., & Jones, R. P. (2014). A shifting landscape: A decade of change in American attitudes about same-sex marriage and LGBT issues. Washinton, DC: Public Religion Research Institute.
16. Olson LR, Cadge W, Harrison JT. Religion and public opinion about same‐sex marriage. Social Science Quarterly 2006; 87(2): 340–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00384.x
17. Sherkat DE, Powell-Williams M, Maddox G, de Vries KM. Religion, politics, and support for same-sex marriage in the United States, 1988–2008. Social Science Research 2011; 40(1): 167–180. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.009
18. Van Geest F. Changing patterns of denominational political activity in North America: The case of homosexuality. Review of Religious Research 2007; 49(2): 199–221.
19. Cochrane C. The effects of Islam, religiosity, and socialization on Muslim-Canadian opinions about same-sex marriage. Comparative Migration Studies 2013; 1(1): 147–178. doi: 10.5117/CMS2013.1.COCH
20. Glas S, Spierings N, Lubbers M, Scheepers P. How polities shape support for gender equality and religiosity’s impact in Arab countries. European Sociological Review 2019; 35(3): 299–315. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcz004
21. Triadafilopoulos T, Rasheed J. A religion like no other: Islam and the limits of multiculturalism in Canada. Available online: https://canadacommons.ca/artifacts/1759927/a-religion-like-no-other/2491574/ (accessed on 25 October 2023).
22. Sherkat DE, Powell-Williams M, Maddox G, de Vries KM. Religion, politics, and support for same-sex marriage in the United States, 1988–2008. Social Science Research, 40(1), 167-180.
23. Astillero FG, Balderama AJG, Galias ABS, Lacsi WC. Acceptance of homosexuals and legalization of same-sex marriage. Research and Analysis Journal 2022; 5(4): 1–8. doi: 10.18535/raj.v5i4.290
24. Tabora RC, Tee KRR, Villanueva JD, Bernarte RP. The religious practices of youth and its relation to their attitude on same-sex marriage. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 2016; 4(2): 57–64.
25. Rae S, Wong KL. Beyond Integrity: A Judeo-Christian Approach to Business Ethics. Harper Collins; 2009.
26. Morales B. Same-Sex Marriage and Christian Ethics: Seeking Truth Among Opposing Cultures and Theologies. Azusa Pacific University; 2015. pp. 1–27.
27. Kronen JD, Reitan EH. Homosexuality, misogyny, and God’s plan. Faith and Philosophy 1999; 16(2): 213–232. doi: 10.5840/faithphil199916216
28. Pietkiewicz IJ, Kołodziejczyk-Skrzypek M. Living in sin? How gay Catholics manage their conflicting sexual and religious identities. Archives of Sexual Behavior 2016; 45(6): 1573–1585. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0752-0
29. Shoko T. “Worse than dogs and pigs?” Attitudes toward homosexual practice in Zimbabwe. Journal of Homosexuality 2010; 57(5): 634–649. doi: 10.1080/00918361003712087
30. Barringer MN, Gay DA, Lynxwiler JP. Gender, religiosity, spirituality, and attitudes toward homosexuality. Sociological Spectrum 2013; 33(3): 240–257. doi: 10.1080/02732173.2013.732903
31. Ford TE, Brignall T, VanValey TL, Macaluso MJ. The unmaking of prejudice: How Christian beliefs relate to attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 2009; 48(1): 146–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01434.x
32. Rule S. Religiosity and quality of life in South Africa. Social Indicators Research 2007; 81(2): 417–434. doi: 10.1007/s11205-006-9005-2
33. Gay DA, Lynxwiler JP, Smith P. Religiosity, spirituality, and attitudes toward same-sex marriage: A cross-sectional cohort comparison. Sage Open 2015; 5(3): 2158244015602520. doi: 10.1177/2158244015602520
34. Gay DA, Lynxwiler JP. Cohort, spirituality, and religiosity: A cross-sectional comparison. The Journal of Religion & Society 2013.
35. Taylor P. The Next America: Boomers, Millennials, and the Looming Generational Showdown. PublicAffairs; 2016.
36. Arnett JJ. Adolescent Psychology Around the World. Psychology Press. 2012.
37. Chavez JV, Adalia HG, Alberto JP. Parental support strategies and motivation in aiding their children learn the English language. Forum for Linguistic Studies 2023; 5(2): 1541. doi: 10.59400/fls.v5i2.1541
38. Chavez JV, Lamorinas DD, Ceneciro CC. Message patterns of online gender-based humor, discriminatory practices, biases, stereotyping, and disempowering tools through discourse analysis. Forum for Linguistic Studies 2023; 5(2): 1535. doi: 10.59400/fls.v5i2.1535
39. Calaro MF, Vicente MB, Chavez JV, et al. Marketing campaigns leading to the purchase of accommodation products: A content analysis. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture 2023; 33: 4221–4236. doi: 10.59670/jns.v33i.2696
40. Mendoza DV. Analysis of the Filipino brand of customer service in the accommodation sector. Journal of Namibian Studies 2023; 33: 4685–4704.
41. Aguirre JKC, Vicente MB, Chavez JV, et al. Content analysis of consumer reviews on preferred characteristics of accommodation products. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture 2023; 33: 4264–4286. doi: 10.59670/jns.v33i.2717
42. Duhaylungsod AV, Chavez JV. ChatGPT and other AI Users: Innovative and creative utilitarian value and mindset shift. Journal of Namibian Studies 2023; 33: 4367–4378. doi: 10.59670/jns.v33i.2791
43. Suen YT, Wong EMY, Chan RCH. Relationship between religion and public attitudes toward same-sex marriage: Examining the role of traditional Chinese religions through a case study of Hong Kong. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 2023. doi: 10.1007/s13178-023-00836-w
44. Coleman E. Bisexual and gay men in heterosexual marriage: Conflicts and resolutions in therapy. Journal of Homosexuality 1982; 7(2–3): 93–103. doi: 10.1300/j082v07n02_11
45. Ortiz ET, Scott PR. Gay husbands and fathers: Reasons for marriage among homosexual men. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services 1994; 1(1): 59–72. doi.org/10.1300/J041v01n01_04
46. Asyraf Zulkffli M, Rashid RA. Discursive strategies employed by homosexual Malaysian Muslim men in talking about homosexuality in Islam. Discourse & Society 2019; 30(3): 307–320. doi: 10.1177/0957926519828032
47. Kissil K, Itzhaky H. Experiences of the marital relationship among orthodox Jewish gay men in mixed-orientation marriages. Journal of GLBT Family Studies 2015; 11(2): 151–172. doi: 10.1080/1550428x.2014.900659
48. Haidt J, Graham J, Joseph C. Above and below left-right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry 2009; 20(2–3): 110–119. doi: 10.1080/10478400903028573
49. Haidt J, Graham J. When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research 2007; 20(1): 98–116. doi: 10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z
50. Pargament KI, Saunders SM. Introduction to the special issue on spirituality and psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology 2007; 63(10): 903–907. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20405
51. Coulter MJ. Spiritual care of gay men in committed relationships: An evidenced-based intercultural approach. Electronic Theses and Dissertations 1907.
52. Diamant J. How Catholics around the world see same-sex marriage, homosexuality. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/11/02/how-catholics-around-the-world-see-same-sex-marriage-homosexuality/ (accessed on 10 July 2023).
53. Perry SL, Whitehead AL. Religion and public opinion toward same‐sex relations, marriage, and adoption: Does the type of practice matter? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 2016; 55(3): 637–651. doi: 10.1111/jssr.12215
54. Elie JE, Mathevon N, Vignal C. Same-sex pair-bonds are equivalent to male-female bonds in a life-long socially monogamous songbird. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2011; 65(12): 2197–2208. doi: 10.1007/s00265-011-1228-9
55. Whitton SW, Weitbrecht EM, Kuryluk AD. Monogamy agreements in male same-sex couples: Associations with relationship quality and individual well-being. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy 2015; 14(1): 39–63. doi: 10.1080/15332691.2014.953649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i1.1912
(342 Abstract Views, 146 PDF Downloads)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jason V. Chavez, Collin C. Ceneciro
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/