Open Journal Systems

Leadership development through 360-degree multi-rater feedback—An experience sharing of need, approach, roll-out, and the impact

Barttanu Kumar Das, Rajini G.

Article ID: 2000
Vol 9, Issue 2, 2024, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 336 (Abstract) 144 (PDF)

Abstract

The organizational development (OD) interventions carried out by the assessment center identifying the competencies becomes effective only if the expectation of the stakeholders is met. A 360-degree multipurpose intervention is to assess and develop project director’s leadership capabilities and enable them to execute Mega Infrastructure Projects in India executed by Larsen and Toubro, the leading engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) players of India. Implementing such Mega Projects by maintaining time, cost, safety, and quality parameters require leadership skills of high order. To meet out this requirement implementation partner interacted with few project directors from each business verticals such as nuclear, hydel, metro, defense, special bridges and ports and harbor, to understand the role holders’ challenges and the expectations. L&T Heavy Civil Infrastructure (HCI) Leadership Competency framework was thus drafted looking into the role intensity and specific role-based challenges of the Mega Project Leaders. The questionnaires were designed to cover all dimensions and sub dimensions of 8 competencies, covering 40 behavioral Indicators. the questionnaires were hosted on the online platform to including self, supervisor, direct repartees, peers, customers, and other stakeholders. Validation to the assessment of each dimension and sub-dimensions as qualitative feedback is done with simple average scores and the range. The study found that execution leadership was the highest rated competency followed by customer engagement and talent management. The study also found that strategic orientation and decision making were rated low compared to other competencies, got validated by comments of customers as well. This is quite evident from the feedback that was taken after 9 months of the intervention. The study by using Delphi technique revealed that by providing feedback from all stakeholders supported by systematic coaching, 88% participants showed improvement in the low rated items. The study further proved that with proper feedback and coaching at an individual level with required trust and keeping development as the core agenda and without linking to any other HR processes like appraisal and promotion, majority of the participants took full ownership, interest and worked on their individual competency development showing their learning agility.


Keywords

leadership development; execution leadership; customer engagement; learning agility; decision making and change management

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Available online: https://en.m.wikipedia.org>360-degree feedback (accessed on 20 August 2023).

2. Periperl M. Getting 360-Degree Feedback Right. Harvard Business Review; 2001.

3. Zenger J, Folkman J. The Extraordinary Leader: Turning Good Managers into Great Leaders. McGraw-Hill; 2002.

4. Rao TV, Rao R. The Power of 360- Degree Feedback—The India Wau for Leadership Effectiveness. Sage Publications; 2014.

5. Alimo-Metcalfe B. 360-degree feedback and leadership development. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 1998; 6(1): 35–44. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00070

6. Day DV. Leadership development: A review in context. The Leadership Quarterly 2000; 11(4): 581–613. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00061-8

7. Cullen-Lester KL, Maupin CK, Carter DR. Incorporating social networks into leadership development: A conceptual model and evaluation of research and practice. The Leadership Quarterly 2017; 28(1): 130–152. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.005

8. Hosain S. 360-degree feedback as a technique of performance appraisal: Does it really work? Asian Business Review 2016; 6(1): 21–24.

9. Das UK, Panda J. The impact of 360-degree feedback on employee role in leadership development. Asian Journal of Management 2017; 8(4): 962. doi: 10.5958/2321-5763.2017.00149.4

10. Aldulaimi SH. Leadership development program and leaders performance for mid-level managers in Saudi petroleum company, ARAMCO. Arab Economic and Business Journal 13(1): 15–24. doi: 10.1016/j.aebj.2018.02.001

11. Azam A. Combined leadership development practices: Improving organizational performance through organizational commitment. International Journal of Business Reflections 2020; 1(1): 111–141

12. Day D, Bastardoz N, Bisbey T, et al. Unlocking human potential through leadership training & development initiatives. Behavioural Science & Policy 2021; 7(1): 41–54. doi: 10.1177/237946152100700105

13. Ellison LJ, Steelman LA, Young SF, Riordan BG. Setting the stage: Feedback environment improves outcomes for a 360-degree-feedback leader-development program. Consulting Psychology Journal 2022; 74(4): 363–382. doi: 10.1037/cpb0000236

14. Rafiq S, Kahdim M, Afzal A. The assessment and impact of 360-degree leadership performance appraisal at university level. Journal of Social Sciences Development 2023; 2(2): 189–203. doi: 10.53664/jssd/02-02-2023-06-189-203

15. Ugwoke EO, Edeh NI, Nwokike FO, et al. Join mediation of psychological empowerment and work-life balance between transformational leadership and in role performance of accounting personnel: 360-degree feedback. Journal of Management & Organization 2023; 1–20. doi: 10.1017/jm0.2023


DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i2.2000
(336 Abstract Views, 144 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Barttanu Kumar Das, Rajini G.

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/