Disentangling the relationship between Big-Five personality characteristics and work engagement: Evidence from India
Vol 9, Issue 1, 2024, Article identifier:
VIEWS - 383 (Abstract) 243 (PDF)
Abstract
This study aims to empirically examine the effect of Big-Five personality traits on employee engagement. A carefully crafted survey instrument was developed, and data were collected from 486 employees working in the banking sector in southern India. After checking the instrument’s measurement properties, data was analyzed using covariance-based structural equation modeling by the Smart-PLS (partial least squares). The results indicate (i) extraversion and agreeableness were positively related to vigor, (ii) conscientiousness is positively related to dedication and absorption, (iii) neuroticism is negatively related to dedication, and (iv) openness to experience is positively related to vigor and absorption. Contrary to what was hypothesized, the results suggest that (i) extraversion is negatively related to absorption, (ii) agreeableness is negatively related to dedication, (iii) neuroticism is positively related to vigor, and (iv) openness to experience is negatively related to dedication. This research demonstrates that all five dimensions of personality characteristics have different impacts on employee engagement. This research advances the bourgeoning literature on personality and employee engagement. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. McCrae RR, Costa PT. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987; 52(1): 81–90. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
2. Albrecht SL, Marty A. Personality, self-efficacy and job resources and their associations with employee engagement, affective commitment and turnover intentions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 2020; 31(5): 657–681. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2017.1362660
3. Amatyakul S, Polyorat K. The traits of city personality: A qualitative study. International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs 2017; 2(6): 356–365. doi: 10.24088/ijbea-2017-26005
4. Shaban S. Predicting Big-Five personality traits relation with employees’ engagement in public sector in Egypt. International Journal of Business and Management Review 2018; 6(1): 33–43.
5. Shanmugam K, Chidambaram V, Parayitam S. Relationship between Big-Five personality traits, financial literacy and risk propensity: Evidence from India. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review 2023; 12(1): 85–101. doi: 10.1177/22779752221095282
6. Nichols CP, Sheldon KM, Sheldon MS. Evolution and personality: What should a comprehensive theory address and how? Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2008; 2(2): 968–984. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00086.x
7. Rajasekar A, Pillai AR, Elangovan R, Parayitam S. Risk capacity and investment priority as moderators in the relationship between big‑five personality factors and investment behavior: A conditional moderated moderated‑mediation model. Quality & Quantity 2022; 57(3): 2091–2123. doi: 10.1007/s11135-022-01429-2
8. Asif A, Ansari N, Rathore K. Empirical relationship of big five personality traits and affective commitment among the public sector employees. International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research 2015; 4(11): 1–8.
9. Barrick MR, Mount MK. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 1991; 44(1): 1–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
10. Hurtz GM, Donovan JJ. Personality and job performance: The big five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology 2000; 85(6): 869–879. doi: 10.1037//002I-9010.85.6.869
11. Matzler K, Renzl B. Personality traits, employee satisfaction and affective commitment. Total Quality Management 2007; 18(5): 589–598. doi: 10.1080/14783360601061528
12. Fukuzaki T, Iwata N. Association between the five-factor model of personality and work engagement: A meta-analysis. Industrial Health 2022; 60(2): 154–163. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2021-0051
13. Inceoglu I, Warr P. Personality and job engagement. Journal of Personnel Psychology 2012; 10(4): 177–181. doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000045
14. Mhlanga TS, Mjoli TQ, Chamisa SF. Personality and job engagement among municipal workers in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa. SA Journal of Human Resource Management 2019; 17(1): 1–11. doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v17i0.1188
15. Chidambaram V, Ramachandran G, Chandrasekar T, Parayitam S. Relationship between stress due to COVID-19 pandemic, telecommuting, work orientation and work engagement: Evidence from India. Journal of General Management 2022. doi: 10.1177/03063070221116512
16. Kahn WA. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal 1990; 33(4): 692–724. doi: 10.2307/256287
17. Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology 2001; 52(1): 397–422. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
18. Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, González-Romá V, Bakker AB. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies 2002; 3(1): 71–92. doi: 10.1023/A:1015630930326
19. Nagarajan R, Swamy RA, Reio TG, et al. The COVID-19 impact on employee performance and satisfaction: A moderated moderated-mediation conditional model of job crafting and employee engagement. Human Resource Development International 2022; 25(5): 600–630. doi: 10.1080/13678868.2022.2103786
20. Wefald AJ, Reichard RJ, Serrano SA. Fitting engagement into a nomological network: The relationship of engagement to leadership and personality. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 2011; 18(4): 522–537. doi: 10.1177/1548051811404890
21. Allport GW., Vernon PE. The field of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 1930;27(10): 677–730. doi：10.1037/h0072589
22. Matz S, Chan YWF, Kosinski M. Models of personality. In: Tkalčič M, De Carolis B, De Gemmis M, et al. (editors). Emotions and Personality in Personalized Services: Models, Evaluation and Applications. Springer International Publishing; 2016; pp. 35–54. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-31413-6
23. Karatepe OM, Aga M. Work engagement as a mediator of the effects of personality traits on job outcomes: A study of frontline employees. Services Marketing Quarterly 2012; 33(4): 343–362. doi: 10.1080/15332969.2012.715053
24. Ongore O, A study of relationship between personality traits and job engagement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2014; 141: 1315–1319. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.226
25. Saks AM. Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2006; 21(7): 600-619. doi: 10.1108/02683940610690169
26. Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology 2007; 22(3): 309–328. doi: 10.1108/02683940710733115
27. Cattell HEP. The sixteen-personality factor (16PF) questionnaire. In: Dorfman WI, Hersen M (editors). Understanding Psychological Assessment. Springer; 2001. pp. 187–215.
28. Zimmerman RD. Understanding the impact of personality traits on individuals’ turnover decisions: A meta-analytic path model. Personnel Psychology 2008; 61(2): 309–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00115.x
29. Christian MS, Garza AS, Slaughter JE. Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology 2011; 64(1): 89–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
30. Hadziahmetovic N., Mujezinovic, M. The Role of the Big Five Personality Profiles in Employee Affective Commitment and Engagement: Case of Small and Medium Enterprises. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 2022; 7(2): 74–88. doi: 10.20469/ijbas.7.10003
31. Ansari JAN. Driving employee engagement through five personality traits: An exploratory study, Metamorphosis 2020; 19(2): 94–105. doi: 10.1177/09726225211007247
32. Jeswani S, Dave S. Impact of individual personality on turnover intention: A study on faculty members. Management and Labour Studies 2012; 37(3): 253–265. doi: 10.1177/0258042x13484837
33. Langelaan S, Bakker AB, van Doornen LJP, Schaufeli WB. Burnout and work engagement: Do individual differences make a difference? Personality and Individual Differences 2006; 40(3): 521–532. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.009
34. Wanberg CR, Kammeyer-Mueller JD. Predictors and outcomes of proactivity in the socialization process. Journal of Applied Psychology 2000; 85(3): 373–385. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.373
35. Panaccio A, Vandenberghe C. Five-factor model of personality and organizational commitment: The mediating role of positive and negative affective states. Journal of Vocational Behavior 2012; 80(3): 647–658. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2012.03.002
36. Zaidi NR, Wajid RA, Zaidi FB, et al. The big five personality traits and their relationship with work engagement among public sector university teachers of Lahore. African Journal of Business Management 2013; 7(15): 1344–1353.
37. Naquin SS, Holton EF. The effects of personality, affectivity, and work commitment on motivation to improve work through learning. Human Resource Development Quarterly 2002; 13(4): 357–376. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.1038
38. Judge, TA., Heller, D. Mount, MK. Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002; 87(3), 530–541. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.530
39. McCrae RR, Costa PT. A five-factor theory of personality. In Pervin LA, John OP (editors). Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. Guilford Press; 1999. pp. 139–153.
40. Ali I. Personality traits, individual innovativeness and satisfaction with life. Journal of Knowledge and Innovation 2019; 4(1): 38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2017.11.002
41. Shukla S, Aggarwal P, Adhikari B, Singh V. Relationship between employee engagement and big five personality factors: A study of online B2C e-commerce company. The Journal of Indian Management & Strategy 2014; 19(3): 26. doi: 10.5958/0973-9343.2014.01233.2
42. Emecheta BC, Awo HO, Ukoha O. Personality characteristics and employee affective commitment: Nigeria experience. International Journal of Business and Management Review 2016; 4(6): 69–92.
43. Kim HJ, Shin KH, Swanger N. Burnout and engagement: A comparative analysis using the big five personality dimensions. International Journal of Hospitality Management 2009; 28(1): 96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2008.06.001
44. Iwata N, Mishima N, Okabe K, et al. Psychometric properties of the state-trait anxiety inventory among Japanese clinical outpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychology 2000; 56(6): 793–806. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200006)56:6<793::AID-JCLP8>3.0.CO;2-4
45. Vaughn LA, Baumann J, Klemann C. Openness to experience and regulatory focus: Evidence of motivation from fit. Journal of Research in Personality 2008; 42(4): 886–894. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.11.008
46. Van Beek IW, Taris T, Schaufeli W, Brenninkmeijer V. Heavy work investment: Its motivational make-up and outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology 2014; 29(1): 46–62. doi: 10.1108/jmp-06-2013-0166
47. Schaufeli WB. Heavy work investment, personality and organizational climate. Journal of Managerial Psychology 2016; 31(6): 1057–1073. doi: 10.1108/jmp-07-2015-0259
48. John, OP., Srivastava, S. The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 1999; (pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.
49. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. Pearson; 2009.
50. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 1981; 18(1): 39–50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104
51. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003; 88(5): 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
52. Kock N. Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration 2015; 11(4): 1–10. doi: 10.4018/ijec.2015100101
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i1.2124
(383 Abstract Views, 243 PDF Downloads)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Sangeetha Narayanasami, Michael Sammanasu Joseph, Satyanarayana Parayitam
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/