Open Journal Systems

Shaping e-waste recycling intentions through psychological motivation: An integrated study of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of Value-Belief-Norm

Yu Xiang, Aweewan Mangmeechai

Article ID: 2180
Vol 9, Issue 3, 2024, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 320 (Abstract) 60 (PDF)

Abstract

This study analyzes the influencing factors of residents’ intention to participate in e-waste recycling behavior with the help of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and Value-Belief-Norm (VBN) model. On the basis of factor analysis, through correlation analysis and regression analysis, this paper conducts an empirical study on the influencing factors of residents’ intention to participate in e-waste recycling behavior, revealing the formation mechanism of residents’ intention to participate in e-waste recycling behavior. The results show that Values, Awareness of consequences, Ascription of responsibility, Behavior attitude, Perceived behavior control and Personal norm are the main factors that affect residents’ participation in e-waste recycling behavior, and the impact of perceived behavior control is the most significant. The research results can help understand the formation mechanism and implementation process of residents’ e-waste recycling behavior intention, predict the possibility of residents’ participation in e-waste recycling behavior in the future, and provide some reference and inspiration for the research of residents’ participation in e-waste recycling behavior in China. In addition, we can essentially understand the reasons for the low recovery rate of e-waste and the lack of scale, and provide reference for the government and relevant departments to formulate corresponding policies and enterprises to establish a standardized recovery system.


Keywords

electronic waste; theory of planned behavior; Value-Belief-Norm theory; psychological motivation

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Xu H. Where is the way out for China’s e-waste treatment? (Chinese). Ecological Economy, 34(7), 4.

2. Forti V, Balde CP, Kuehr R, Bel G. The Global E-waste Monitor 2020: Quantities, flows and the circular economy potential. 2020.

3. Darby L, Obara L. Household recycling behaviour and attitudes towards the disposal of small electrical and electronic equipment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2005, 44(1): 17-35. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.09.002

4. Zeng X, Gong R, Chen WQ, et al. Uncovering the Recycling Potential of “New” WEEE in China. Environmental Science & Technology. 2016, 50(3): 1347-1358. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05446

5. Zhang W, Jiang H, Wang J, Lu Y. Amount of electronic waste generated in China: Prediction and characteristics analysis (Chinese). Environmental Science & Technology. 2013, 36(6): 5.

6. Ge YJ, Jin YY, Nie YF. Recovery and management of electronic wastes: Status quo and needs for improvement. Environmental Science & Technology. 2006, 29(3): 3.

7. Shittu OS, Williams ID, Shaw PJ. Global E-waste management: Can WEEE make a difference? A review of e-waste trends, legislation, contemporary issues and future challenges. Waste Management. 2021, 120: 549-563. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.10.016

8. Sakhuja D, Ghai H, Bhatia RK, et al. Management of E-Waste: Technological Challenges and Opportunities. Handbook of Solid Waste Management. 2022, 1523-1557. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-4230-2_69

9. Murthy V, Ramakrishna S. A Review on Global E-Waste Management: Urban Mining towards a Sustainable Future and Circular Economy. Sustainability. 2022, 14(2): 647. doi: 10.3390/su14020647

10. Li W, Achal V. Environmental and health impacts due to e-waste disposal in China—A review. Science of The Total Environment. 2020, 737: 139745. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139745

11. Cucchiella F, D’Adamo I, Lenny Koh SC, et al. Recycling of WEEEs: An economic assessment of present and future e-waste streams. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015, 51: 263-272. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.010

12. Bosnjak M, Ajzen I, Schmidt P. The theory of planned behavior: Selected recent advances and applications. Europe’s Journal of Psychology. 2020, 16(3): 352-356. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v16i3.3107

13. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin. 1975, 82(2): 261-277. doi: 10.1037/h0076477

14. Ajzen I. From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. Action Control. 1985, 11-39. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2

15. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991, 50(2): 179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t

16. Wiidegren Ö. The New Environmental Paradigm and Personal Norms. Environment and Behavior. 1998, 30(1): 75-100. doi: 10.1177/0013916598301004

17. Wan C, Shen GQ, Choi S. Experiential and instrumental attitudes: Interaction effect of attitude and subjective norm on recycling intention. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2017, 50: 69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.02.006

18. Tonglet M, Phillips PS, Bates MP. Determining the drivers for householder pro-environmental behaviour: waste minimisation compared to recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2004, 42(1): 27-48. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.02.001

19. Zhong H, Huang L. The Empirical Research on the Consumers’ Willingness to Participate in E-waste Recycling with a Points Reward System. Energy Procedia. 2016, 104: 475-480. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.080

20. Wang Z, Guo D, Wang X. Determinants of residents’ e-waste recycling behaviour intentions: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016, 137: 850-860. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.155

21. Stone TH, Jawahar IM, Kisamore JL. Using the theory of planned behavior and cheating justifications to predict academic misconduct. Career Development International. 2009, 14(3): 221-241. doi: 10.1108/13620430910966415

22. Jia D. Analysis of public willingness to participate in environmental public decision-making based on planned behavior theory (Chinese). Contemporary Economic Management. 2018, 40(1): 7.

23. Conner M, Armitage CJ. Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1998, 28(15): 1429-1464. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x

24. Stern PC. New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues. 2000, 56(3): 407-424. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175

25. Schwartz SH. Normative Influences on Altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 1977, 221-279. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60358-5

26. Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel T, et al. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review. 1999, 6(2): 81-97.

27. Yue T. Research on Influencing Factors and Guiding Policy of Energy-Conservation Behavior of Urban Residents (Chinese). China University of Mining and Technology; 2014.

28. Chen MF, Tung PJ. Developing an extended Theory of Planned Behavior model to predict consumers’ intention to visit green hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2014, 36: 221-230. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.09.006

29. Han H. Travelers’ pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: Converging value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior. Tourism Management. 2015, 47: 164-177. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.014

30. Pomazal RJ, Jaccard JJ. An informational approach to altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1976, 33(3): 317-326. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.33.3.317

31. van Riper CJ, Kyle GT. Understanding the internal processes of behavioral engagement in a national park: A latent variable path analysis of the value-belief-norm theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2014, 38: 288-297. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.03.002

32. Han H. Travelers’ pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: Converging value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior. Tourism Management. 2015, 47: 164-177. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.014

33. Klöckner CA, Blöbaum A. A comprehensive action determination model: Toward a broader understanding of ecological behaviour using the example of travel mode choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2010, 30(4): 574-586. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.001

34. Hu B, Fu Y, Xiong Y. The driving factors and the formation mechanism of tourists’ intention participating in low-carbon tourism: Based on theory of planned behavior (Chinese). Business Economics Administration. 2014, 8(9): 64-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2154.2014.08.007

35. Oreg S, Katz-Gerro T. Predicting Proenvironmental Behavior Cross-Nationally. Environment and Behavior. 2006, 38(4): 462-483. doi: 10.1177/0013916505286012

36. Cao H, Zhao K. Influence factors and effect decomposition of households’ intention of chemical fertilizer reduction: An empirical analysis based on VBN-TPB (Chinese). Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition. 2018, 6: 29-38.

37. De Groot J, Steg L. General Beliefs and the Theory of Planned Behavior: The Role of Environmental Concerns in the TPB. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2007, 37(8): 1817-1836. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00239.x

38. Petschnig M, Heidenreich S, Spieth P. Innovative alternatives take action – Investigating determinants of alternative fuel vehicle adoption. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2014, 61: 68-83. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.01.001

39. Wang Y, Ma J, Ma B. Research on recycling status and recycling mode of waste mobile phones in China (Chinese). Economist. 2013, (6): 51-53.

40. Arı E, Yılmaz V. A proposed structural model for housewives’ recycling behavior: A case study from Turkey. Ecological Economics. 2016, 129: 132-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.002

41. Oztekin C, Teksöz G, Pamuk S, et al. Gender perspective on the factors predicting recycling behavior: Implications from the theory of planned behavior. Waste Management. 2017, 62: 290-302. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.036

42. Zhang S, Zhang M, Yu X, et al. What keeps Chinese from recycling: Accessibility of recycling facilities and the behavior. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2016, 109: 176-186. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.02.008

43. Tong X, Nikolic I, Dijkhuizen B, et al. Behaviour change in post-consumer recycling: Applying agent-based modelling in social experiment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018, 187: 1006-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.261

44. Sheppard BH, Hartwick J, Warshaw PR. The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research. Journal of Consumer Research. 1988, 15(3): 325. doi: 10.1086/209170

45. Schwartz SH. Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 1992, 1-65. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6

46. Huang X, Lu Z, Wang YA. Study on Construction Analysis Model of Influencing Factors of Low-carbon Touristic Living Behaviors Based on TPB and VBN. Science and Technology Management Research. 2013, 33(21): 10.

47. Bamberg S, Möser G. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2007, 27(1): 14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002

48. Sutton S. The past predicts the future: Interpreting behaviour—behaviour relationships in social psychological models of health behaviour. In: Rutter DR, Quine L (editors). Social Psychology and Health: European Perspectives. Avebury/Ashgate Publishing Co.; 1994. pp. 71–88.

49. Matthies E, Selge S, Klöckner CA. The role of parental behaviour for the development of behaviour specific environmental norms – The example of recycling and re-use behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2012, 32(3): 277-284. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.04.003

50. Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Press; 2011.

51. Hair JF. Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed. Prentice Hall; 1998.

52. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981, 18(1): 39-50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104

53. Chin WW. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota. 1998, 22(1).

54. Sheeran P, Orbell S. Augmenting the Theory of Planned Behavior: Roles for Anticipated Regret and Descriptive Norms1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1999, 29(10): 2107-2142. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb02298.x

55. Kiatkawsin K, Han H. Young travelers’ intention to behave pro-environmentally: Merging the value-belief-norm theory and the expectancy theory. Tourism Management. 2017, 59: 76-88. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.06.018

56. Yu J, Williams E, Ju M, et al. Managing e-waste in China: Policies, pilot projects and alternative approaches. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2010, 54(11): 991-999. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.02.006


DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i3.2180
(320 Abstract Views, 60 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Yu Xiang, Aweewan Mangmeechai

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/