Open Journal Systems

Education in a pandemic, learning to guarantee inclusive education from an approach psychosocial

Ana Maria Torres, Sergio Sanchez

Article ID: 2238
Vol 9, Issue 6, 2024, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 179 (Abstract) 81 (PDF)


distance learning; emotions; motivation; self-regulation; information technologies; educational policy

Full Text:



1. UNICEF. Covid-19: Are Children Able to Continue Learning During School Closures? A Global Analysis of the Potential Reach of Remote Learning Policies Using Data From 100 Countries. Available online: file:///home/minotebook/Descargas/COVID-19-Remote-Learning-Factsheet_English_2020.pdf (accessed on 28 October 2023).

2. Alban Conto C, Akseer S, Dreesen T, et al. Potential effects of COVID-19 school closures on foundational skills and Country responses for mitigating learning loss. International Journal of Educational Development. 2021, 87: 102434. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102434

3. Renzulli L, Werum R, Kronberg A. The Rise of Homeschooling Regulation in the Era of School Choice: Legislative and Judicial Trends, 1972–2009. Rev Sociol Forum 2020. doi: 10.1111/socf.12582

4. Rice K. A comprehensive look at distance education in the K-12 context. J Res Technol Educ 2006; 38: 425–448. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2006.10782468

5. Trautwein U, Lüdtke O, Schnyder I, et al. Predicting homework effort: Support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2006, 98(2): 438–456. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.438

6. Martin-Chang S, Gould ON, Meuse RE. The impact of schooling on academic achievement: Evidence from homeschooled and traditionally schooled students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement. 2011, 43(3): 195–202. doi: 10.1037/a0022697

7. Ray B. A Review of research on Homeschooling and what might educators learn? Pro-Posições. 2017, 28(2): 85–103. doi: 10.1590/1980-6248-2016-0009

8. Mitra S, Dangwal R. Limits to self-organising systems of learning—the Kalikuppam experiment. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2010, 41(5): 672–688. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01077.x

9. World Bank. Acting Now to Protect Our Children's Human Capital: The Costs and Response to the Impact of Pandemic COVID-19 on the Education Sector in Latin America and the Caribbean (Spanish). Grupo Banco Mundial Educación 2021.

10. Baron J, Taveras CM, Cuevas J. Adaptive technology to improve mathematics learning in the Dominican Republic (Spanish). Available online: (accessed on 28 October 2023).

11. Angel-Urdinola D. Use of computer-assisted remediation programs to prevent student dropout in the context of COVID-19 (Spanish). Available online: (accessed on 28 October 2023).

12. Baber H. Social interaction and effectiveness of the online learning – A moderating role of maintaining social distance during the pandemic COVID-19. Asian Education and Development Studies. 2021, 11(1): 159–171. doi: 10.1108/aeds-09-2020-0209

13. Noesgaard SS, Ørngreen R. The effectiveness of e-learning: An explorative and integrative review of the definitions, methodologies and factors that promote e-Learning effectiveness. Electron J.E-Learn 2015; 13: 278–290.

14. Lean QY, Ming LC, Wong YY, et al. Validation of online learning in pharmacy education: effectiveness and student insight. Pharmacy Education, 2018; 18: 135–142.

15. Wang Y, Ma J, Kremer GE, et al. An investigation of effectiveness differences between in-class and online learning: an engineering drawing case study. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM). 2018, 13(1): 89–98. doi: 10.1007/s12008-018-0510-8

16. Tsang J, So M, Chong A, et al. Higher Education during the Pandemic: The Predictive Factors of Learning Effectiveness in COVID-19 Online Learning. Education Sciences. 2021, 11(8): 446. doi: 10.3390/educsci11080446

17. Nishikawa-Pacher A. Research Questions with PICO: A Universal Mnemonic. Publications. 2022, 10(3): 21. doi: 10.3390/publications10030021

18. Arbeláez M, Onrubia J. Bibliometric and content analysis. Two complementary methodologies for the analysis of the Colombian journal Educación y Cultura (Spanish). Revista de Investigaciones UCM. 2016, 14(23): 14–31. doi: 10.22383/ri.v14i1.5

19. Korstjens I, Moser A. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice. 2017, 24(1): 120–124. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092

20. UNICEF. Evaluation of UNICEF’s Response to the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa 2014–2015; 2017.

21. UNESCO. Declaration of Qingdao (Spanish). UNESCO; 2015.

22. UNESCO, UNICEF, Banco Mundial, Programa Mundial de Alimentos. Framework for the Reopening of Schools. (Spanish). 2020.

23. Combette LT, Camenen E, Rotge JY, et al. Identified Motivation as a Key Factor for School Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic-Related School Closure. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752650

24. Chifari A, Allegra M, Benigno V, et al. Distance Learning During the First Lockdown: Impact on the Family and Its Effect on Students’ Engagement. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.762213

25. Thorsteinsen K, Parks-Stamm EJ, Olsen M, et al. The Impact of COVID-19-Induced Changes at Schools on Elementary Students’ School Engagement. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.687611

26. Simm I, Winklhofer U, Naab T, et al. How Children and Adolescents Perceive Their Coping with Home Learning in Times of COVID-19: A Mixed Method Approach. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 733428. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733428

27. Treviño E, Miranda C, Hernández M, et al. Socioeconomic Status, Parental Involvement and Implications for Subjective Well-Being During the Global Pandemic of Covid-19. Frontiers in Education. 2021, 6. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.762780

28. Garrote A, Niederbacher E, Hofmann J, et al. Teacher Expectations and Parental Stress During Emergency Distance Learning and Their Relationship to Students’ Perception. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 712447. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712447

29. Vogelbacher M, Attig M. Carrying the Burden into the Pandemic – Effects of Social Disparities on Elementary Students’ Parents’ Perception of Supporting Abilities and Emotional Stress During the COVID-19 Lockdown. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.750605

30. Spinelli M, Lionetti F, Pastore M, et al. Parents’ Stress and Children’s Psychological Problems in Families Facing the COVID-19 Outbreak in Italy. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020, 11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01713

31. Haller T, Novita S. Parents’ Perceptions of School Support During COVID-19: What Satisfies Parents? Frontiers in Education. 2021, 6. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.700441

32. Toppe T, Stengelin R, Schmidt LS, et al. Explaining Variation in Parents’ and Their Children’s Stress During COVID-19 Lockdowns. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.645266

33. Henter R, Nastasa LE. Parents’ Emotion Management for Personal Well-Being When Challenged by Their Online Work and Their Children’s Online School. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.751153

34. Mousavi SF. Psychological Well-Being, Marital Satisfaction, and Parental Burnout in Iranian Parents: The Effect of Home Quarantine During COVID-19 Outbreaks. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020, 11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.553880

35. Bonal X, González S. The impact of lockdown on the learning gap: family and school divisions in times of crisis. Int Rev Educ 2020; 66(5-6): 635–655. doi: 10.1007/s11159-020-09860-z

36. Helm C, Huber SG. Predictors of Central Student Learning Outcomes in Times of COVID-19: Students’, Parents’, and Teachers’ Perspectives During School Closure in 2020—A Multiple Informant Relative Weight Analysis. Frontiers in Education. 2022, 7. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.743770

37. Sáez-Delgado F, Mella-Norambuena J, López-Angulo Y, et al. Association Between Self-Regulation of Learning, Forced Labor Insertion, Technological Barriers, and Dropout Intention in Chile. Frontiers in Education. 2021, 6. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.801865

38. Martin AJ, Collie RJ, Nagy RP. Adaptability and High School Students’ Online Learning During COVID-19: A Job Demands-Resources Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702163

39. Pelikan ER, Lüftenegger M, Holzer J, et al. Learning during COVID-19: the role of self-regulated learning, motivation, and procrastination for perceived competence (German). Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft. 2021, 24(2): 393–418. doi: 10.1007/s11618-021-01002-x

40. Lockl K, Attig M, Nusser L, Wolter I. Cognitive and Affective-Motivational Factors as Predictors of Students’ Home Learning During the School Lockdown. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 751120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.751120

41. Chere B, Kirkham N. The Negative Impact of Noise on Adolescents’ Executive Function: An Online Study in the Context of Home-Learning During a Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715301

42. Knowles G, Gayer‐Anderson C, Turner A, et al. Covid-19, social restrictions, and mental distress among young people: a UK longitudinal, population-based study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2022, 63(11): 1392–1404. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13586

43. Commodari E, La Rosa VL. Adolescents and Distance Learning during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy: What Impact on Students’ Well-Being and Learning Processes and What Future Prospects? European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education. 2021, 11(3): 726–735. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11030052

44. De Coninck D, Matthijs K, Van Lancker W. Distance Learning and School-Related Stress Among Belgian Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Education. 2022, 7. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.836123

45. Sanrey C, Goudeau S, Stanczak A, et al. A Two-Sided Lockdown? Social Class Variations in the Implementation of Homeschooling During the COVID-19 Lockdown. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.670722

46. Tannert S, Gröschner A. Joy of distance learning? How student self-efficacy and emotions relate to social support and school environment. European Educational Research Journal. 2021, 20(4): 498–519. doi: 10.1177/14749041211024784

47. Bhargava S, Witherspoon DP. Parental Involvement Across Middle and High School: Exploring Contributions of Individual and Neighborhood Characteristics. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2015, 44(9): 1702–1719. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0334-9

48. Liu X, He W, Zhao L, et al. Gender Differences in Self-Regulated Online Learning During the COVID-19 Lockdown. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752131

49. Zancajo A. The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Education: Rapid Review of the Literature Covid and Society—British Academy. Available online: (accessed on 28 October 2023).

50. Australian Academy of Science. Learning outcomes for online versus in-class education. Available online: (accessed on 28 October 2023).

51. Schneider R, Sachse KA, Schipolowski S, et al. Teaching in Times of COVID-19: The Evaluation of Distance Teaching in Elementary and Secondary Schools in Germany. Frontiers in Education. 2021, 6. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.702406

52. Andrew A, Cattan S, Costa Dias M, et al. Inequalities in Children’s Experiences of Home Learning during the COVID‐19 Lockdown in England*. Fiscal Studies. 2020, 41(3): 653–683. doi: 10.1111/1475-5890.12240

53. Kuhfeld M, Soland J, Tarasawa B, et al. Projecting the potential impact of covid-19 school closures on academic achievement. Educ Res 2020; 49: 549–565. doi: 10.3102/0013189X20965918

54. Spicksley K, Kington A, Watkins M. “We Will Appreciate Each Other More After This”: Teachers’ Construction of Collective and Personal Identities During Lockdown. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.703404

55. Verulava T, Darbaidze M, Baramia M, et al. Online Learning of Students with Special Needs: Teachers’ Perspectives. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education. 2022, 14(1): 01–07. doi: 10.9756/int-jecse/v14i1.221001

56. Sánchez Amate JJ, Luque de la Rosa A, Gutiérrez Cáceres R, et al. The Effects of COVID-19 in the Learning Process of Primary School Students: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences. 2021, 11(10): 654. doi: 10.3390/educsci11100654

57. Termine C, Dui LG, Borzaga L, et al. Investigating the effects of COVID-19 lockdown on Italian children and adolescents with and without neurodevelopmental disorders: a cross-sectional study. Current Psychology. 2021, 42(10): 8615–8631. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02321-2

58. Asbury K, Fox L, Deniz E, et al. How is COVID-19 Affecting the Mental Health of Children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities and Their Families? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2020, 51(5): 1772–1780. doi: 10.1007/s10803-020-04577-2

59. Nusser L. Learning at home during COVID-19 school closures – How do German students with and without special educational needs manage? European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2021, 36(1): 51–64. doi: 10.1080/08856257.2021.1872845

60. Maurer J, Becker A, Hilkenmeier J, et al. Experiences and Perceived Self-Efficacy in Distance Learning Among Teachers of Students with Special Educational Needs. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733865

61. Baten E, Vlaeminck F, Mues M, et al. The impact of school strategies and the home environment on home learning experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic in children with and without developmental disorders. Published online September 27, 2021. doi: 10.31219/

62. Ueda R, Okada T, Kita Y, et al. Psychological Status Associated with Low Quality of Life in School-Age Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders During COVID-19 Stay-At-Home Period. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2021, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.676493

63. Morgül E, Kallitsoglou A, Essau CA, et al. Caregiver-Reported Changes in the Socioemotional Wellbeing and Daily Habits of Children With Special Educational Needs During the First COVID-19 National Lockdown in the United Kingdom. Frontiers in Education. 2022, 7. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.838938

64. Houghton S, Kyron M, Lawrence D, et al. Longitudinal trajectories of mental health and loneliness for Australian adolescents with‐or‐without neurodevelopmental disorders: the impact of COVID‐19 school lockdowns. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2022, 63(11): 1332–1343. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13579

65. Simpson K, Adams D. Brief Report: Covid Restrictions had Positive and Negative Impacts on Schooling for Students on the Autism Spectrum. J Autism Dev Disord 2022: 1–7. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05451-z

66. Genova HM, Arora A, Botticello AL. Effects of School Closures Resulting From COVID-19 in Autistic and Neurotypical Children. Frontiers in Education. 2021, 6. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.761485

67. Amorim R, Catarino S, Miragaia P, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (Spanish). Rev Neurol 2020; 71: 285–291.

68. UNICEF. UNICEF’s lessons learned from the education response to the COVID-19 crisis and reflections on the implications for education policy. Int J Educ Dev 2021; 85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102429.

69. Amri A, Tebe Y, Siantoro A, et al. Teachers voices on school reopening in Indonesia during COVID-19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 2021, 4(1): 100218. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100218

70. Luna Bazaldua D, Levin V, Liberman J. Guidance for the Use of Learning Assessments in the School Reopening Process (Spanish). Banco Mundial; 2020.

71. UNICEF, UNESCO, World Bank. What Have We Learnt? Overview of Findings from a Survey of Ministries of Education on National Responses to COVID-19. 2020.

72. OECD. Making the Most of Technology for Learning and Training in Latin America. OECD Publishing 2020.

73. Huang R, Liu D, Tlili A, et al. Guidance on Open Educational Practices during School Closures: Utilizing OER under COVID-19 Pandemic in line with UNESCO OER Recommendation. Beijing: Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University; 2020.

74. UNESCO. CT Competency Framework for Teachers (Spanish). UNESCO; 2019. Version 3.

75. OECD. How’s Life in the Digital Age? Opportunities and Risks of the Digital Transformation for People’s Well-being. OECD Publishing 2019.

76. OECD. PISA 2015 Results (Volume III): Students’ Well-Being. OECD Publishing; 2017.

77. Betegón E, Rodríguez-Medina J, del-Valle M, et al. Emotion Regulation in Adolescents: Evidence of the Validity and Factor Structure of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022, 19(6): 3602. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063602

78. Dominguez-Lara SA, Calderón-De la Cruz G, Alarcón-Parco D, Navarro-Loli JS. Relationship between test anxiety and exam performance in university students: preliminary analysis of the difference according to subject (Spanish). Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria 2017;11(1):166–176. doi: 10.19083/ridu.11.492.

(179 Abstract Views, 81 PDF Downloads)


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2024 Ana Maria Torres, Sergio Sanchez

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.