Open Journal Systems

Profile and local perceptions regarding domestic violence in Bulgaria

Krasimira Petrova

Article ID: 2271
Vol 9, Issue 5, 2024, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 150 (Abstract) 367 (PDF)

Abstract

Domestic violence, regarded as a prevalent matter of public health, encompasses actions employed by an individual within a relationship to manipulate the other party. Although it has garnered considerable attention, the prevalence of domestic violence exhibits notable disparities across distinct regions within a nation, thereby indicating the impact of diverse socio-economic, cultural, and political elements. This study delves further into the available evidence concerning regional discrepancies in domestic violence rates, providing valuable insights into the factors that contribute to this phenomenon and its implications for policy formulation in Bulgaria. With the method of the survey and the conduct of focus groups, the perception of violence and the local characteristics were brought out. The quantitative research included 2800 respondents (100 from each administrative region of Bulgaria), and the qualitative included 700 respondents, who were in 14 predetermined culturally distinct regions. The main interest of that paper is how domestic violence looks in the perceptions of Bulgarians in different regions and what domestic violence looks like in Bulgaria. The main hypothesis posits that individuals’ attitudes towards violent relationships are greatly influenced by their personal experiences with violence. We suggest that societal norms and stereotypes surrounding violence play a significant role in fostering “positive attitudes” towards aggressive behaviors.


Keywords

domestic violence; violence perception; local peculiarities of violence perception

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Jewkes R. Intimate partner violence: causes and prevention. The Lancet. 2002, 359(9315): 1423-1429. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08357-5

2. Kaukinen C. Status Compatibility, Physical Violence, and Emotional Abuse in Intimate Relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2004, 66(2): 452-471. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00031.x

3. Dugan L, Nagin DS, Rosenfeld R. Exposure Reduction or Retaliation? The Effects of Domestic Violence Resources on Intimate‐Partner Homicide. Law & Society Review. 2003, 37(1): 169-198. doi: 10.1111/1540-5893.3701005

4. Benson ML, Fox GL. Concentrated Disadvantage, Economic Distress, and Violence Against Women in Intimate Relationships. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 2004, 41(3): 263-293.

5. Cunradi CB. Drinking Level, Neighborhood Social Disorder, and Mutual Intimate Partner Violence. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2007, 31(6): 1012-1019. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00382.x

6. Simmons CA, Lehmann P, Collier-Tenison S. Men’s Use of Controlling Behaviors: A Comparison of Reports by Women in a Domestic Violence Shelter and Women in a Domestic Violence Offender Program. Journal of Family Violence. 2008, 23(6): 387-394. doi: 10.1007/s10896-008-9159-6

7. Doku DT, Asante KO. Women’s approval of domestic physical violence against wives: analysis of the Ghana demographic and health survey. BMC Women’s Health. 2015, 15(1). doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0276-0

8. Ferdous N, Kabir R, Khan HTA, et al. Exploring the relationship of Domestic violence on Health Seeking behavior and Empowerment of Women in Pakistan. Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Public Health. 2022, 14(1). doi: 10.2427/12231

9. Yanikkerem E, Karadaş G, Adıgüzel B, et al. Domestic Violence during Pregnancy in Turkey and Responsibility of Prenatal Healthcare Providers. American Journal of Perinatology. 2006, 23(02): 093-104. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-931802

10. Madhani FI, Karmaliani R, Patel C, et al. Women’s Perceptions and Experiences of Domestic Violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2016, 32(1): 76-100. doi: 10.1177/0886260515585533

11. Nadda A, Malik JS, Rohilla R, et al. Study of Domestic Violence among Currently Married Females of Haryana, India. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine. 2018, 40(6): 534-539. doi: 10.4103/ijpsym.ijpsym_62_18

12. Manolov MN, Ivanov IK, Chavdarova VA. Gender-Role Stereotypes in the Bulgarian Family: Cross-Generational Transmission of Gender Attitudes. Societies. 2023, 13(7): 152. doi: 10.3390/soc13070152

13. Петрова К, Тaсевскa Д, Чaвдaрoвa B. Study of the Ethnopsychological and Cultural Characteristics of the Bulgarian Family in the Context of Gender-Based Violence; Faber: Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria. 2021.

14. Hahn S, Needham I, Abderhalden C, et al. The effect of a training course on mental health nurses’ attitudes on the reasons of patient aggression and its management. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 2006, 13(2): 197-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.00941.x

15. Erdem A, Sahin R. Undergraduates’ Attitudes toward Dating Violence: Its Relationship with Sexism and Narcissism. International Journal of Higher Education. 2017, 6(6): 91. doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v6n6p91

16. Slovak K, Carlson K, Helm L. The Influence of Family Violence on Youth Attitudes. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal. 2007, 24(1): 77-99. doi: 10.1007/s10560-006-0063-8

17. Trüdinger EM, Ziller C. Setting limits to tolerance: An experimental investigation of individual reactions to extremism and violence. Frontiers in Political Science. 2023, 5. doi: 10.3389/fpos.2023.1000511

18. Jankey O, Próspero M, Fawson P. Mutually violent attitudes: effects on intimate partner violence and mental health symptoms among couples in Botswana, Africa. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research. 2011, 3(1): 4-11. doi: 10.5042/jacpr.2011.0017

19. Hurd NM, Zimmerman MA, Reischl TM. Role Model Behavior and Youth Violence: A Study of Positive and Negative Effects. The Journal of Early Adolescence. 2010, 31(2): 323-354. doi: 10.1177/0272431610363160

20. Simane-Vigante L, Plotka I, Blumenau N. Research of the Relationship of Criminal Violence, Adult Attachment Styles and Personality Traits of Violent Male Offenders. Rural environment Education Personality (REEP): proceedings of the 11th International scientific conference. Published online May 2, 2018. doi: 10.22616/reep.2018.015

21. Manolov M, Stoyanov I, Georgieva Z, et al. Social Inheritance in the Context of Psychology. Open Journal of Social Sciences. 2019, 07(07): 50-59. doi: 10.4236/jss.2019.77005

22. Манолов М, Иванов И. Public policies regarding gender-role stereotypes and attitudes leading to violent rela-tionships in the Bulgarian family (policies and practices). Faber: Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria. 2023.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i5.2271
(150 Abstract Views, 367 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Krasimira Petrova

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/