Open Journal Systems

Fashion advertising: A brief bibliometric review

Mahendra Fakhri, Natan Fernando Ananka Sinaga, Syahputra Syahputra, Mahir Pradana

Article ID: 2288
Vol 9, Issue 5, 2024, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 214 (Abstract) 97 (PDF)

Abstract

Controversial advertising wields a considerable influence on customers’ purchase intentions, creating both positive and negative outcomes. Using bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review, this article attempts to present an overview of previous studies on the use of advertising, regardless of how contentious or inventive it may be. We looked through published papers to see which prominent figures in this subject have contributed, what significant subtopics are, and what further research may be done. We found that the number of papers produced on this topic between 2000 and 2023 is already increasing. We also use network analysis to map the research clusters. A total of 93 articles were discovered according to the findings. According to the report, terms like “purchase intention,” “controversy,” and “offensive advertising” have not been adequately investigated. This paper adds to the body of knowledge on the subject for academics and business policymakers. This thoughtful approach is crucial considering the significant impact of controversial advertising on consumer behavior and purchase intentions.


Keywords

advertising; controversial advertising; fashion industry; consumer behavior; bibliometric analysis

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Susanty AI, Yuningsih Y, Anggadwita G. Knowledge management practices and innovation performance. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. 2019; 10(2): 301-318. doi: 10.1108/jstpm-03-2018-0030

2. Willayat F, Saud N, Ijaz M, et al. Marshall–Olkin Extended Gumbel Type-II Distribution: Properties and Applications. Rihan FA, ed. Complexity. 2022; 2022: 1-23. doi: 10.1155/2022/2219570

3. Kollmeyer B. Sales at Balenciaga continue to suffer after the child marketing scandal. Dow Jones & Company; 2023.

4. Liu JH, North M, Li C. Relationship building through reputation and tribalism on companies’ Facebook pages. Internet Research. 2017; 27(5): 1149-1169. doi: 10.1108/intr-03-2016-0078

5. Madni AR, Hamid NA, Rashid SM. Influence of Controversial Advertisement on Consumer Behavior. The Journal of Commerce. 2016; 8(1–2): 14-24.

6. Parisi, Danny. The Balenciaga controversy, explained. Glossy; 2022.

7. Saadellaoui I. Ethical Judgment and Humorous Advertising. Psychology and Behavioral Science International Journal. 2018; 9(1). doi: 10.19080/pbsij.2018.08.555752

8. Saxton WO. Quantitative comparison of images and transforms. Journal of Microscopy. 1998; 190(1-2): 52-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2818.1998.3380884.x

9. Watson JB. Advertising by Radio. JWT News Bulletin; 1923.

10. Yoon Y, Gürhan‐canli Z; Schwarz N. The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities on Companies with Bad Reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2006; 16(4): 377-390.

11. Zhao Y, Wang L, Tang H, et al. Electronic word-of-mouth and consumer purchase intentions in social e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 2020; 41: 100980. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2020.100980

12. Asghar F, Mahmood S, Iqbal Khan K, et al. Eminence of Leader Humility for Follower Creativity During COVID-19: The Role of Self-Efficacy and Proactive Personality. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022; 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.790517

13. Rachmawati WI, Kartawinata BR, Wijayangka C, Hasbi I. Factors Analysis that Affecting the Intention to Use Digital Payment (Case Study on OVO Users in Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, Bekasi). KnE Social Sciences; 2020. pp. 290-302.

14. Dewi WS, Pradana M, Sari D, et al. The Influence of Knowledge, Social Media Utilization and Motivation on Entrepreneurial Intention (Case Study: Telkom University Students). Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Published online March 7, 2021. doi: 10.46254/an11.20211178

15. Rubiyanti N, Mohaidin Z, Murshid MA. Purchasing Behaviour: Mediating Roles of Brand Personality and Religiosity in the Purchase of Halal Cosmetics. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah (Special Issue); 2022: 113–120.

16. Salsabila AA, Fakhri M, Silvianita A, et al. The effect of organizational culture and work motivation on employee job satisfaction. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management.

17. Sharma S, Mathur G. Effect of Trust, Perceived Value, Brand Reputation and Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty: A Study of Print and Electronic Media. IJMR. 2018; 8(5): 1-11.

18. Rahmawaty S, Kartawinata BR, Akbar A, et al. The Effect of E-Service Quality and E-Trust on E-Customer Loyalty Through E-Customer Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable (Study on Gopay Users in Bandung). Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Published online March 7, 2021. doi: 10.46254/an11.20210933

19. Mansoor M, Wijaksana TI. Predictors of pro-environmental behavior: Moderating role of knowledge sharing and mediatory role of perceived environmental responsibility. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2022; 66(5): 1089-1107. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2021.2016380

20. Moeliono N, Fakhri M, Sari D, et al. (2020). Green brand awareness factors on the body shop product. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i5.2288
(214 Abstract Views, 97 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Mahendra Fakhri

License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/