The development and psychometric analysis of Uskudar family perception and attitudes scale
Vol 9, Issue 6, 2024, Article identifier:
VIEWS - 69 (Abstract) 23 (PDF)
Abstract
Today, the increasing use of digital media transforms relationships, family perceptions and attitudes. This situation poses a risk to the family institution and children. In this context, measurement tools aimed at determining family perceptions and attitudes should be reconsidered in current studies. The aim of this study was to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool that can measure family perceptions and attitudes dimensionally. The sample of the research consisted of 495 participants in Turkey. As a result of the study, 3-dimensional (Family concept, Fears affecting relationships, Individualization and freedom) and 20-item Uskudar Family Perception and Attitudes Scale (USFPAS) was developed. The scale explained 51.18% of the total variance. The Cronbach Alpha value of the scale was found to be .75. In the modeling and confirmatory factor analysis study, goodness of fit values was found to be in acceptable range. According to the results of psychometric analysis: (1) Women have higher fears that affect family relationships than men, (2) As daily social media use increases, the level of individualization and freedom increases, and family perception and attitude levels decrease, (3) Those who have children have higher fears that affect relationships than those who do not, and their perceptions of individualization and freedom are lower. The valid and reliable scale developed in this research will provide concrete data to the literature.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Bronfenbrenner, U., Ecological systems theory. Annals of Child Development, 1989(6): p. 187-249.
2. Bronfenbrenner, U., Ecological systems theory, in Encyclopaedia of psychology, A. Kazdin, Editor. 2000, American Psychological Association. p. 129-133.
3. Bayer, A., Family in a Changing Social Structure. Şırnak University Faculty of Theology Journal, 2013. 4(8): p. 101-129.
4. Gönül, B., H. Işık-Baş, and B. Şahin-Acar, Turkish adaptation and psychometric analysis of the Family Climate Scale. Turkish Journal of Psychological Counseling and Guidance, 2018. 8(50): p. 165-200.
5. Tarhan, N., Happy marriage psychology. 28 ed. 2019a: Timaş Publishing.
6. Bowlby, J., Attachment and loss: Issue 1. Attachment. 1969: Basic Books.
7. Bowlby, J., Attachment and loss: Issue 2. Separation. . 1973: Basic Books.
8. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Autonomous-Relational self: A new synthesis. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 1996. 11(37): p. 36-43.
9. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Self, family, and human development: Cultural psychology. 2010: Koç University.
10. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., B. Ataca, and A. Diri, Intergenerational relationships in the family: Ethnic, socioeconomic, and country variations in Germany, Israel, Palestine, and Turkey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2010. 41(5-6): p. 652-670.
11. Luna, I., et al., The relevance of familism in cross-cultural studies of family caregiving. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 1996. 18(3): p. 267-283.
12. Sümer, N., E. Gündoğdu Aktürk, and E. Helvacı, Psychological effects of parental attitudes and behaviors: An overview of studies conducted in Turkey. Turkish Psychology Articles, 2010. 13(25): p. 42-59.
13. Tarhan, N., You, Me and Our Children. 2012: Timaş Publishing.
14. Tunç, A. and E. Tezer, The relationship between child-rearing styles and self-esteem. Turkish Journal of Psychological Counseling and Guidance, 2016. 3(25).
15. Yagmurlu, B. and A. Sanson, Parenting and temperament as predictors of prosocial behaviour in Australian and Turkish Australian children. Australian Journal of Psychology, 2009. 61(2): p. 77-88.
16. Mavili, A., N.F. Kesen, and S. Daşbaş, Family Sense of Belonging Scale: A study of developing a scale. Journal of Social Policy Studies, 2014(33): p. 29-45.
17. Hagerty, B.M., et al., Sense of belonging and indicators of social and psychological functioning. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 1996. 10(4): p. 235-244.
18. Mavili-Aktaş, A., Soclal work intervention in family therapy system. Family and Society, 2004. 2(7): p. 33-43.
19. Ardahan, M., Social support and nursing. Atatürk University School of Nursing Journal, 2006. 9(2): p. 68-75.
20. Lepore, S.J., G.W. Evans, and M.L. Schneider, Dynamic Role of Social Support in the Link between Chronic Stress and Psychological Distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991. 61(6): p. 899-909.
21. Hagerty, B.M. and R.A. Williams, The effects of sense of belonging, social support, conflict, and loneliness on depression. Nursing Research, 1999(48): p. 215-219.
22. Aksüllü, N. and S. Doğan, The relationship between perceived social support factors and depression in elderly people living in nursing homes and at home. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 2004. 5(1): p. 76-84.
23. Goldenberg, H. and I. Goldenberg, Family therapy: An overview. 2012: Cengage Learning.
24. Gülerce, A., Psychological patterns of families in Turkey. 1996: Boğaziçi University Publishing.
25. Sheridan, S.M., et al., Family-centered positive psychology: Focusing on strengths to build student success. Psychology in the Schools, 2004. 41(1): p. 7-17.
26. Vetere, A., Structural family therapy. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 2001. 6(3): p. 133-139.
27. Tarhan, N., Being a Conscious Family. 7 ed. 2019b: Timaş Publishing.
28. Sürücü, A., Parent-child communication. Teacher's World. 2005. 10(3): p. 169-186.
29. Tarhan, N., Family School and Marriage. 24 ed. 2017: Timaş Publishing.
30. Çalışkan, M., M. Toker, and Y. Özbay, Validity and reliability analysis of Family Life Satisfaction Scale. International Journal Of Early Childhood Educaiton Studies, 2017. 2(1): p. 1-9.
31. Dağlı, A. and N. Baysal, Adaptation of the Life Satisfaction Scale into Turkish: Validity and reliability study. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 2016. 15(59).
32. Greeff, A.P., Characteristics of families that function well. Journal of Family Issues, 2000. 21(8): p. 948-962.
33. Tarhan, N. and A. Tutgun-Ünal, Uskudar Life Meaning and Goals Scale validity and reliability studies. The Journal of Neurobehavioral Sciences, 2022. 9(2): p. 58-67.
34. Yıldız, M.A. and K. Baytemir, A mediation role of self-esteem in the relationship between marital satisfaction and life satisfaction in married individuals. İnönü University Faculty of Education Journal, 2016. 17(1): p. 67-80.
35. Epstein, N.B., et al., The McMaster Model: View of healthy family functioning, in Normal family processes (2nd ed.), F. Walsh, Editor. 1993, Guilford Press. p. 138-160.
36. Hallaç, S. and F. Öz, A Theoretical Perspective of Family Concept. Current Approaches in Psychiatry, 2014. 6(2): p. 142-153.
37. Miller, I.W., et al., The McMaster Approach to Families: theory, assessment, treatment and research. Journal of Family Therapy, 2000. 22(2): p. 168-189.
38. Björnberg, Å. and N. Nicholson, The family climate scales -: Development of a new measure for use in family business research. Family Business Review, 2007. 20(3): p. 229-246.
39. Tasdelen-Karçkay, A., Family Life Satisfaction Scale-Turkish Version: Psychometric Evaluation. Social Behavior and Personality, 2016. 44(4): p. 631-639.
40. Zabriskie, R.B. and P.J. Ward, Satisfaction With Family Life Scale. Marriage and Family Review, 2013. 49(5): p. 446-463.
41. Gardner, D.L., et al., The Development and Validation of the Inventory of Family Protective Factors: A Brief Assessment for Family Counseling. Family Journal, 2008. 16(2): p. 107-117.
42. Gökler Danışman, I. and S. Köksal, The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of inventory of family protective factors. Turkish Psychological Articles, 2011. 14(28): p. 39-46.
43. Özabacı, N. and S. Körük, Development of The Perceived Family Functioning Scale (PFFS):Investigation of its psychometric properties. Journal of Family Psychological Counseling, 2021. 4(2): p. 53-72.
44. Bardis, P.D., A familism scale. Marriage & Family Living, 1959a(21): p. 340-341.
45. Bardis, P.D., Attitudes toward the family amongcollege students and their parents. Sociology & Social Research, 1959b(43): p. 352-358.
46. Steidel, A.G.L. and J.M. Contreras, A new familism scale for use with Latino populations. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 2003. 25(3): p. 312-330.
47. Bulut, I., Family Assessment Scale Manual. 1990: Özgüzeliş Printing House.
48. Eskin, M., Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Perceived Social Support from Friends and Family Scales, Scale for Interpersonal-Behavior, and Suicide Probability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1993. 49(4): p. 515-522.
49. Kaner, S., Family Support Scale: Factor structure, reliability and validity studies. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 2003. 4(1): p. 57-72.
50. Procidano, M.E. and K. Heller, Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: three validation studies. Am J Community Psychol, 1983. 11(1): p. 1-24.
51. Duru, E., An Adaptation Study of Social Connectedness Scale in Turkish Culture. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2007(26): p. 85-94.
52. Ersanlı, K. and M. Koçyiğit, Psychometric properties of the Belonging Scale. Turkish Studies-International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 2013. 8(12): p. 751-764.
53. Hagerty, B.M. and K.L. Patusky, Developing a measure of sense of belonging. Nursing Research, 1995(44): p. 9-13.
54. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., N. Baydar, and Z. Cemalcılar, Autonomy and relatedness scales (Progress report). 2006.
55. Demirtaş-Zorbaz, S. and F. Korkut-Owen, Development of the Family Relationship Scale for Children. Turkish Journal of Psychological Counseling and Guidance, 2013. 4(39): p. 58-67.
56. Tavşancıl, E. and E. Aslan, Content analysis and application examples for verbal, written and other materials. 2021: Epsilon
57. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Manual of data analysis for social sciences. Pegem Citation Index. 2018.
58. Sharma, S., Applied Multivariate Techniques. 1996: John Wiley&Sons Inc.
59. Tinsley, H. and D. Tinsley, Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research. J Couns Psychol., 1987. 34(4): p. 414-424.
60. Can, Y., Social media as a postmodern disclosure field. The Journal of International Social Sciences, 2021. 31(1): p. 419-430.
61. Güleç, V., Family relations, social media, along with the collapse. e-Journal of New Media, 2018. 2(2): p. 105-120.
62. Kalaman, S. and F. Çelik, The impact of the usage of Turkey’s married individuals’ social media usage on their marriage: A qualitative research. International Journal of Society Researches, 2019. 13(19): p. 424-453.
63. Tarhan, N., Modernism devalued motherhood, in NevzatTarhan.com. 2013.
64. Tarhan, N., Cultural transmission is done by social media, not family, in NevzatTarhan.com. 2022.
65. Birol, S.Ş., Psycho-social examination of women's lives after divorce. KMU Journal of Social and Economic Research, 2017. 19(32): p. 47-54.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i6.2482
(69 Abstract Views, 23 PDF Downloads)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Nevzat Tarhan, Çiğdem Demirsoy, Aylin Tutgun Ünal
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/