A study on female Korean university students’ perception of male’s role
Vol 9, Issue 7, 2024, Article identifier:
VIEWS - 0 (Abstract) 0 (PDF)
Abstract
This study investigates the perceptions of men held by female students in a Korean university, a place where the most liberal and exploratory discussions unfold. The study aims to examine how women perceive male’s role in Korea, and thus, employs Q-methodology to understand the different types of perception of male’s role. According to the results, there are a total of four types of perception: type I “dualistic norm perception,” type II “superiority perception,” type III “subjective perception,” and type IV “gender-balanced perception.” When comparing the aforementioned outcomes to feminist phase theory, type I overlaps with phase 3 of duality, and type II manifests characteristics of both the male-defined phase 1 of male dominance and phase 2 of contribution. In reality, however, the gender-balanced phase can be seen as extremely rare in the Korean society that embraces heterosexual norms. Nevertheless, the fact that type IV balanced gender is apparent in some female university students can be interpreted as an indication of change of perception toward the other sex role in Korean society.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Sung, M., Chin, M., & Ki, P. (2023) Understanding the Perception of Confucian Patriarchy through Ancestor Worship and Inheritance: Focusing on Gender and Generation Differences Journal of Families and Better Life 41(3), 65-79. DOI:10.7466/JFBL.2023.41.3.65.
2. Byun, H., Chang, H., Kim, H., Jeon, Y., Jeong, J., & Koo, S. (2005). Current state of family and gender conflicts and policy tasks. Korea Policy Development Center. Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
3. Makama, G. A. (2013). Patriarchy and gender inequality in Nigeria: The way forward. European scientific journal, 9(17), 115-144. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/101027987/1177
4. Rye, Y., & Kim, Y. (2019). An exploratory study on gender conflict perception in Korea: Focused on the moderating effect of gender. Korean Social Policy Review, 26(4), 131-160. file:///C:/Users/songy/Downloads/KCI_FI002532927.pdf
5. Kim, B. (2019). Gender conflicts and antifeminism in contemporary South Korea. Cross-Cultural Studies, 56, 1-25. KCI_FI002509177.pdf
6. Ma, K. (2007). Reflections on gender mainstreaming. Journal of Korean Women’s Studies, 23(1), 39-67. https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/
7. Kim, G., Han, D., & Han, H. (2003). Effects of group status, stability of men on gender social identity and gender equality action. Korean Psychological Association: Society and Personality, 17(1), 31-47. https://accesson.kr/ksppa/assets/pdf/14508/
8. Tetreault, M. K. T. (2006). Classrooms for diversity: Rethinking curriculum and pedagogy. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives 7 (pp. 186-214). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Tetreault, C. (1991). Metacommunication in a women’s studies classroom and other conversations about race (Unpublished thesis, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York).
10. Gornick, V., & Morgan, B. K. (1972). Women in sexist society: Studies in power and powerlessness. New York: Penguin Group.
11. Code, L. (1991). What can she know? feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Cornell University Press.
12. Alcoff, L., & Medieta, E. (2003). Identities: Race, Class, Gender and Nationality. London: Blackwell.
13. Brown, S. R. (1996). Q methodology and qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 6(4), 561–567. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Steven-R-Brown/publication/247303074
14. Lee, S., Lee, S., & Jeong, H. (2020). Theory and application of Q-methodology. Daejeon: Chungnam National University Publishing Cultural Center.
15. Paik, Y., & Kim, S. (1998). An observation on Q-methodology studies. Journal of Education & Culture, 4, 47-71. G704-SER000012151.1998.4.013
16. Tetreault, M. K. T. (1985). Feminist phase theory: An experience-derived evaluation model. The Journal of Higher Education, 56(4), 363-384.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i7.2780
(0 Abstract Views, 0 PDF Downloads)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Song Yi Lee, Hyang-suk Bu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.